After Stuxnet Computer Virus: Iran says it's discovered 2nd cyber attack

By REUTERS  
04/25/2011 13:16 

"Who is wiping who off the map?"

Official says new virus, "Stars," is being investigated; virus' target isn't revealed; official warns that Stuxnet still poses a risk; urges legal action in "cyber wars."

TEHRAN - Iran has been targeted by a second computer virus in a "cyber war" waged by its enemies, its commander of civil defense said on Monday.

Gholamreza Jalali told the semi-official Mehr news agency that the new virus, called "Stars", was being investigated by experts. Last year, Iran revealed that its computers were attacked by the Stuxnet worm, which attack the Bushehr nuclear reactor.

"Fortunately, our young experts have been able to discover this virus and the Stars virus is now in the laboratory for more investigations," Jalali was quoted as saying. He did not specify the target of Stars or its intended impact.

"The particular characteristics of the Stars virus have been discovered," Jalali said. 

"The virus is congruous and harmonious with the [computer] system and in the initial phase it does minor damage and might be mistaken for some executive files of government organizations."

Jalali warned that the Stuxnet worm, discovered in computers at Iran's Bushehr nuclear reactor last year, still posed a potential risk. Some experts described it as the world's first "guided cyber missile", aimed at Iran's atomic program.

Iran officials said they had neutralized Stuxnet before it did the intended damage to its nuclear facilities. They blamed Israel and the United States -- which believe Iran is seeking nuclear weapons -- for the virus.

'Stuxnet virus is still a risk'

The existence of Stuxnet became public knowledge around the time that Iran began loading fuel into Bushehr, its first nuclear reactor, last August. Iran said in September that staff computers at Bushehr had been hit but that the plant itself was unharmed.

Bushehr is still not operational, having missed several start-up deadlines. This has prompted speculation that Stuxnet damaged the plant, something Iran denies.

Officials have said the virus could have posed a major risk had it not been discovered and dealt with before any major damage was done.

Some defense analysts say the main target was more likely to be Iran's uranium enrichment program. Enrichment creates fuel for nuclear power plants or, if pursued to a much higher degree, can provide material for an atomic bomb.

Jalali said Stuxnet might still pose a risk. 

"We should know that fighting the Stuxnet virusdoes not mean the threat has been completely tackled, because viruses have a certain life span and they might continue their activities in another way."

He urged the government to take action against the enemies he said were waging cyber war on Iran.

"Perhaps the Iran Foreign Ministry had overlooked the options to legally pursue the case, and it seems our diplomatic apparatus should pay more attention to follow up the cyber wars staged against Iran," Jalali said.

Red Cross official: There is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza

Communicated by the IDF to the Israel News Agency Red Cross official: There is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza 20 April 2011 , 18:03

The Red Cross is an international organization founded in 1863. It promotes laws that protect the victims of war and provides humanitarian aid to people living in conflict zones. IDF Spokesperson Share| More Articles Thousands of Christian pilgrims hold mass on Jordan River Replacing margarine with tahina, IDF embraces healthy nutrition From slaves in Egypt to heroes in Japan IDF officers take part in symposium on ethics during warfare Restrictions implemented in Judea and Samaria during Passover holiday Budget, timeline approved for moving IDF bases to the Negev All Articles Mathilde Redmatn, deputy director of the Red Cross is Gaza, says her organization's repeated requests to monitor Gilad Shalit's condition have been refused by Hamas  Rotem Caro Weizman  Mathilde Redmatn is the deputy director of the Red Cross in the Gaza Strip. Redmatn has had the opportunity to see with her eyes what most of us only see on television screens. On previous assignments, Redmatn has lived in Congo and Colombia. Her activities in Gaza are completely different, she says.  "Of course the work is different everywhere, but here the fabric of life is problematic," she says. "There are two peoples, one living under closure and one living under daily rocket fire, which violates international law. Redmatn has a lot to say about problems related to the closure Israel has placed on Gaza but she also talks about the surprising normalcy in one of the most explosive regions of the world that receives extensive media attention. "There is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza," she explains. "If you go to the supermarket, there are products. There are restaurants and a nice beach.  The problem is mainly in maintenance of infrastructure and in access to goods, concrete for example. But above all, it is important to remember that the Israeli army has the right to protect the civilian population in its country. Israel is also hurt on a daily basis by violations of international law by Hamas." The Red Cross is an international organization founded in 1863. It promotes laws that protect the victims of war and provides humanitarian aid to people living in conflict zones.  Red Cross representatives have worked in Gaza since 1967. Their goal, says Redmatn, is twofold. "We are documenting human rights violations according to international law and we speak with relevant parties on how to take care of the issue," Redmatn says.  "We are talking about captives , soldiers, the wounded, and in fact anyone defined by the Geneva Convention. Additionally, in the area of humanitarian assistance, we are mainly engaged in the areas of water and sanitation. We are talking about a highly dense population.  Most of the infrastructure cannot be improved due to the closure so we try to improve the situation with existing tools. One example of this is a factory we helped establish in order to clean sewage water that spills into the sea." The Marmara, Hamas and the Arab world It is important to remember that the Red Cross is not a political organization by definition.  It operates through reports and two-sided dialogue, without expressing its own positions, maintaining complete neutrality. "Our goal is not to negotiate peace, but to ensure the well-being of the civilian population," Redmatn says. "We understand and recognize Israel's right to security but it needs to maintain the balance between that and the right of Palestinians living in Gaza to a living and to proper medical care.  Of course this is also the responsibility of Hamas to its citizens and therefore we also have relations with them." The Red Cross played a role in the Gaza flotilla incident last year. "We offered our assistance to Israeli authorities in regards to people who were arrested who were from countries without diplomatic relations with Israel," Redmatn says. On the question of whether the flotilla was peaceful, she answers neutrally "this is a matter we discuss with the responsible parties." According to her, the flotilla led to changes in Israeli policy on Gaza but those changes are not yet complete. "More goods enter, but there is still room for improvement" in regards to exports and the passage of people, she says. A clear goal, but is it possible in light of the current threat? The subject, Redmatn says, is sensitive. "Rocket fire from the Gaza Strip is against international law because it is directed at civilians," she says. "We conduct hidden dialogue with Hamas on the matter. As time passes, the dialogue also develops." On recent events in the Arab world, Redmatn says: "The new wind blowing in the Arab world doesn’t change the current activities of the Red Cross in the Gaza Strip. It's still too early to tell what will happen and how needs will change. In any case, we will respond quickly to changes and we will see what the future holds." "We will continue to ask to monitor Gilad Shalit but we do not have the capability to force anything on Hamas" Operating in the Gaza Strip requires the Red Cross to work on an ongoing basis with the IDF. "The relationship with the IDF has developed over the years," Redmatn says. "The army understands our mandate. We are in daily contact with each other to coordinate the entry of goods into Gaza and the entry and exit of people, sometimes our personnel and sometimes patients who are going to Israel to receive medical care. The second matter still needs improvement as the time required to cross the border is still long. We hope to augment the medical equipment in Gaza itself in order to reduce the number of people who need to go outside [of Gaza]." These days, she says, the organization has the goal of strengthening the relationship with IDF soldiers. "Not everyone understands what we are doing," she says. "Therefore, we talk about our work to soldiers who serve at the Erez crossing. The intention is to expand this to the entire area around Gaza." But working with the IDF does not only regard the civilian population living in Gaza; it also touches on captive IDF soldier Gilad Shalit. Repeated requests by the Red Cross to monitor Shalit's condition have so far been met with persistent refusal by Hamas. "When a person's freedom is taken away, he deserves at least contact with his family," Redmatn says. "We will continue to ask but we do not have the capability to force anything on Hamas.  Hamas' refusal is based on security reasons. Hamas is afraid of the IDF's advanced technological capabilities and believes that allowing contact will lead to the location of Gilad." Redmatn called on all sides to abide by international law. "It is important that organizations and countries respect international law," she said. "Only thus will the situation get better."

Oren Helman - The Voice of Israel

The voice of Israel

By HERB KEINON  
04/18/2011 16:08 

The Jerusalem Post

The Government Press Office’s director, Oren Helman, muses on his new job – and the foreign media.

On January 11, at Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s annual new year press conference with the foreign media in Jerusalem, Oren Helman was introduced to the foreign press corps as the Government Press Office’s new head, taking over from Danny Seaman, who had a rather torrid 10-year relationship with the foreign press.

In what seemed an effort to turn over a whole new leaf with the reporters, Helman told the journalists gathered that the GPO was there to serve them. The journalists, he said, were the GPO’s clients.

Just before he took the podium, however, Israeli- Arab Al-Jazeera reporter Najwan Simri Diab refused to take off her bra for a security search in an incident since dubbed “bra-gate,” and angrily walked away from the event.

Welcome to your new job, Oren! Al-Jazeera quickly filed a complaint with the GPO and the Foreign Press Association (FPA) following the incident, and a day latter Helman sent a letter saying, “First of all, I would like to express my regret that journalists left the GPO Annual Cocktail Reception feeling that they were treated in an unbecoming manner by security. Obviously, we do not invite journalists to an event in order to offend them.”

“You are not only our clients, but you are our preferred clients,” he said. “We will be receptive to your professional needs, and we will try to assist you as much as possible. My door is always open to you.”

For some, the tone of this letter signified that, indeed, a new era in the GPO had begun. Whereas Seaman was often criticized for being overly confrontational with, and cynical of, the foreign press, Helman’s tone suggested a much different approach.

Sitting last week in the GPO offices at Beit Agron, offices that will be moving out of the building later this year to the Malha Technology Park where may of the foreign press’ offices are situated, Helman set the tone for the entire interview saying that while he and Seaman may not “always agree on everything, we respect each other, and I have a lot to learn from him.”

Seaman has since moved over to become deputy director general of the Public Diplomacy and Diaspora Affairs Ministry, the ministry which now is in charge of the GPO, instead of the Prime Minister’s Office, which was the case until now.

“My predecessor was an excellent professional, a true Zionist,” Helman said. “Everything he did was for the good of Israel and Israeli hasbara. And even if

THE TONE Helman set with these remarks was diplomatic. New at the job, he took over in November after working previously as a lobbyist and before that as a political adviser for Binyamin Netanyahu when he was finance minister and later Opposition head, Helman – unlike his outspoken predecessor – was careful not to ruffle feathers or pounce on toes.

For instance, Seaman – in an interview with The Jerusalem Post’s editor David Horovitz last November – said of the foreign press that “you have journalists coming in here not having the faintest idea of what is going on. They live off what they get from their colleagues; they meet certain people who come from the same social-economic background; they live off of one newspaper, Ha’aretz. They don’t make an effort. When you have a conversation with them, you find that they have a complete lack of knowledge of the elementary issues.”

Helman’s take – at least at this early stage of his tenure – is markedly different. He said his operating assumption was that the foreign journalists coming here to cover the story are basically fair. Although saying there were exceptions, “I think that in the final analysis the foreign correspondents in Israel are fair and professional. And a professional, responsible person won’t lie to himself.”

The glaring exception, he said, was Al Jazeera.

Al Jazeera, Helman charged, dropping the diplomatic demeanor for a moment, “is not a balanced, fair network, or one that brings out Israel’s reality as it is. It is slanted – that needs to be our assumption, and we have to do our best given those conditions.”

Helman said his job is not that of a censor.

“I can’t come to them and say, ‘since you didn’t report in a proper way, I will take away your press cards.’ This is not my way. My way is to try, through smarter means, to get Israel’s message across more objectively – to bring someone to the studio to say what Israel has to say, in Arabic, preferably, without the need for someone to translate.”

Asked why the government can’t sanction media outlets that intentionally distort news from Israel, Helman said the reason is simple: democracy.

“In a democracy you can’t shut mouths, even of those who criticize and work against the state from inside the state, like Al Jazeera,” he said. “We are a democracy. We have to remember that. We are not Libya or the Palestinian Authority, and we cannot allow ourselves to close their offices and expel them – We would lose all our legitimacy in the world if we would act in an undemocratic manner.”

But still, he is asked, does Israel have to go to the other extreme, and give foreign journalists tax breaks to live here. Helman recently lobbied to retain a clause giving members of the foreign press corps here for under three years a 25% discount in their income tax payments.



“Yes,” he said, “because Israel has a big interest in foreign journalists living here, in Israel, and getting to know Israeli society, democracy, the Israeli experience, Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and that we are good people who want peace. We want to attract them to live here.”

He said that if the tax breaks were rescinded – as was proposed but not adopted a few weeks ago – ”and they go live in Ramallah, which is now a prosperous city, their attitudes toward Israel would not improve.”

What the tax breaks do, he said, “is show that the country is democratic, enlightened, open, exposed, and not opposed to media criticism. We not only host them, but give benefits if they live here.”

Helman, who comes across both as personable and energetic, said that his overall aim was to turn the GPO into the government’s public relations office to the foreign press. He refuted the idea that with the foreign ministry, the public diplomacy ministry, and a number of new private initiatives – including The Israel Project, Media Central, and Israel21c– all aiming efforts at the foreign press there were too many cooks spoiling the broth and there were bound to be bureaucratic battles over turf.

“I think it is good there are many different elements dealing with hasbara,” said Helman, whose office employs 30 people, including the official government photographers, and has a budget of “between NIS 5 to 10 million a year.”

He said he works in close coordination with the other governmental agencies dealing with public diplomacy, and pointed to the way the government handled Richard Goldstone’s recent article in The Washington Post that corrected the impression left by the Goldstone Commission as a case in point.

He said that after the article was written, a conference call was held among a number of different governmental agencies, and a plan was set out that included Netanyahu giving an on camera statement in response to the Goldstone article, and a conference call for foreign journalists the next day with Strategic Affairs Minister Moshe Ya’alon.

Ultimately, however, numerous other actors chimed in, with Interior Minister Eli Yishai even calling Goldstone and then, according to Goldstone, misrepresenting what was said in the conversation.

Asked if this wasn’t an example of Israeli overkill – of taking something and just piling on until it is smothered – Helman, again diplomatically, said, “We are a democratic society. I am the last one to criticize decision makers.”

The “overkill” criticism was also heard following the interdiction of the Victoria ship in March carrying Iranian arms. A day alter the ship was hauled into Ashdod’s port, what seemed like the country’s entire top brass appeared there – including Netanyahu, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon, Chief of General Staff Lt.- Gen. Benny Gantz, OC Navy Adm. Eliezer Marom and Public Affairs Minister Yuli Edelstein, to show the world the arms that were captured. Because Netanyahu was there, security measures were extremely strict, and after waiting 90 minutes in the sun a number of foreign journalists just picked up and left, without filming the event or the contraband weaponry.

Asked if this wasn’t indeed a bad case of overstatement, and whether Israeli couldn’t have presented the story to the world without what looked like such a staged event, Helman said his impression was that the foreign press would not have gone to Ashdod unless Netanyahu was there.

“Our goal was to get maximum exposure,” Helman said, adding that Netanyahu enabled that.

Regarding the security precautions, an issue that also touches on “bra-gate,” Helman said that one of his priorities was to deal with the “relationship between the security services and the foreign press. I think the foreign press should get different treatment from what they are getting now.”

He said that he has already been in contact with the security authorities at the airport to see if it is possible to ease checks on journalists coming in and leaving the country, if the authorities are told in advances.

“There is a team working on this in the Public Diplomacy Ministry,” he said.

HELMAN SAID that security procedures provide him with a constant annoyance. “I am here to give them service,” he said of the foreign press. “When your clients are not pleased, then it gives you a headache.”

Does it affect their coverage, he is asked.

“Yes, first because they are mad, bitter and humiliated, and that impacts on a personal level. And then there is the technical level – if they can’t get in to cover the ship [the Victoria] , that says everything.”

While Helman said he does not see his job as a censor, and he does believe the coverage coming out of Israel is basically fair and professional, when the coverage obviously doesn’t meet those standards he says he will flag it down.

“When there are extreme cases of reports that in my eye are not professional, I will respond,” he said. He did so after the murder of the Fogel family in Itamar last month, writing a letter to CNN and taking issue with a story on their website that put “terror attack” in quotations in the headline of the story of the murders.

Responding to the story headlined “Israeli Family of 5 Killed in ‘Terror Attack,’ Military Says,” Helman wrote CNN that he was “dumbfounded and astonished” to read that the slaughter of the Fogel family is “what the Israeli army calls a ‘terrorist attack.’”

“Your remarks sound as if we are talking about an IDF ‘claim’ that this was ‘a terrorist attack’ and that this is not necessarily the case,” he wrote. “If this is not a terrorist attack, then what is?” He called for an apology. The news organization did issue a statement saying, however, that it was “standard journalistic practice for news organizations to put quotation marks around remarks attributed to third parties.”

“I thought that went beyond the rules of the game, and so responded like I did,” Helman explained. He said that while CNN’s response did not satisfy him, he did not continue “to fight with them. I said what I wanted to say, and to argue with them beyond that point would be to turn it into something personal.”

Helman said his approach was not to chastise or yell at the press. Rather, he said, he wanted to create a dialogue with the reporter, “take them to see things, give them briefings, give them more information.”

Helman, like so many other hasbara operatives, talks about the need to show Israel beyond the conflict – he gives it the acronym TIMTI, there is more to Israel” – and hopes through briefings and various tours to expose journalists to the country’s dynamic economy and technological innovations.

But he doesn’t only want to take them to an Intel plant or get them briefed by Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz, he also is planning a trip for foreign journalists to Hebron, to show them an aspect of the city that doesn’t come out in reports abroad: a robust, bustling city with three malls and a new $10 million sports center.

“You have to bring them there to see what is being talked about,” he said. “It is not how they say, a city under the oppressive occupation of the Israelis. People are not suffering that greatly there. It is something that you have to bring to their attention, take them there. In the end they will write what they want, but they should see.”

Helman likened the briefings and trips and the conference calls for the journalists to filling a sponge with water.

“When you put a sponge in water, you won’t see the difference in the shape. But when you lift it out you will feel the difference. The same is with journalists.

Give them the information. They are smart, professional, and experienced. They will know what to do with it when the time comes. But invest in them.”

In Israel, Remembering One Passover Massacre, Living Another Of Father's, Children's Rights

In Israel, Remembering One Passover Massacre, Living Another
Of Father's, Children's Rights

0digg

By Joel Leyden
Israel News Agency

Jerusalem, Israel ---- April 16, 2011 ...... As a professional journalist, one must be able to observe and report objectivity. From high tech, fashion and the arts to politics, natural disasters and social media. But the two areas for which veteran journalists truly dread reporting from is the battle field and the family court. There could not be two topics which are more devastating to the human soul. And no amount of press credentials and being behind the camera can buffer one entirely from the blood and the tears.

In March of 2002, this writer, by chance, was across the street from the Park Hotel in Netanya, Israel celebrating a Passover seder.

Shortly after finishing the long and heavy meal, we all heard and felt a boom. A blast of loud noise which shook every Passover seder book, wall picture and actually moved the dining table. As the lights above us swayed, we stared at one another. I knew that no construction work was going on at that hour. I knew as a combat engineer in the Israel Defense Forces that a terror attack just took place.

Within minutes we could hear the wail of ambulance, fire and police sirens as they made their way to the hotel. This seaside hotel was hosting hundreds of families for a Passover Seder dinner. They came from New York, Paris, London, Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Families with young children dressed in their holiday best. To hear the story of the Jewish exodus from Egypt to freedom in ancient Israel.

As they were praying and singing, an Islamic terrorist walked past two security guards at the entrance of the Park Hotel, past the front lobby and into the main dining room. After yelling "Allah Akbar" in English meaning "god is great" he set off a lethal suicide bombers belt.

Over twenty men, women and children were murdered. Over 180 innocent Jewish civilians were injured.

As soon as I saw a breaking news announcement on Israel TV saying that there was a terror attack in Netanya, I grabbed my coat and left for carnage that awaited across the street. Those I was with begged me not to go, but as a reporter, as a messenger for Israel it was my duty to observe and report this barbaric atrocity.

It was a three block walk on a cold, chilly evening to the hotel. As I arrived, fireman were rushing in with hoses and dazed, bleeding and shocked Jews stumbled out of the hotel. I walked over at least 5 bodies that were strewn on the sidewalk. Inside, all electric was gone. Only a thick grey smoke and the sound of crying.

As I walked into the darkened dining room I witnessed body parts and blood among the dangling electric wires and broken wooden tables. The Passover seder books were ripped apart, laying blood stained on the floor. I looked for any sign of life. To help those who had survived the terror attack out of the hotel. But the police and fire fighters had already removed the living. I was now walking among the dead. Middle aged men, women, grandparents and children slumped over tables or lying on the ground.

One could only hear the sound of water dripping from the crushed fire detector sprinkler system above and the pain of those who were bleeding outside.

I told the AP that there was no life inside. People dressed in their finest suits and dresses were now cold, lifeless corpses. Hard to articulate a scene such as this let alone to find a rational reason for it to happen.

Many years later, a massacre of another sort is taking place in Israel. A massacre of loving, caring relationships between fathers and their children. For in the democratic State of Israel, thousands of good dads have had their parenting rights stolen from them. All it takes is an angry, psychotic spouse to make an unsubstantiated claim of child abuse.

If a claim of child abuse was made in London or New York, social works and forensic psychologists would be dispatched in hours to protect the child. To ascertain what had happened and if the charges were false to protect the father from a ruined relationship with his children, to protect his reputation. But not in Israel where there is very little money to investigate. Where family court judges take little if no responsibility as they pass that job onto child welfare which not having money then passes the buck back to the family court.

While this paper file bounces between family court in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Haifa or Kfar Sava and child welfare in Holon, Ra'anana, Beer Sheva or Hadera the father is told that the only way that he can now see his children is in supervised visitation centers (merkaz kesher). Many fathers will not bow to this humiliation order by a callous family court and opt to simply walk away. Leaving thousands of children without fathers in Israel.

The massacre takes place. And this time there are no police, fire fighters or soldiers rushing in to help the wounded.

One father in Israel, David Marcus, an immigrant from Chicago living in Haifa, tells his story. This reserve officer in the IDF who saved 53 children in Haiti and advises the Israel government on public affairs has been treated no less than a criminal.

"My ex-wife hates me more than she loves our children," says Marcus. "It all began with my 9-year-old son complaining that his mother was hitting him. At first I didn't believe him and upon further questioning I realized that he was being physically abused by his mother. I asked child welfare to investigate and stop the beatings. They warned the mother to stop. If I had wanted to secure custody of my child at the time, all I had to do was make a formal complaint to the family court or to the police, but I did not want to take the mother away from the child. Just wanted the mother to stop the punching and slapping of my young child's head."

"After a month I had private detectives on me. Stalking me and at one point they assaulted me. As they were throwing punches and pushing me, my son yelled out for them to stop killing his father. Neighbors came out and photographed the assault. I was a little behind on child support, but given that my ex makes over two million dollars a year, it was never a point of contention. But she tried to use this to have me arrested several times. I made all the payments and even went to the States to secure more money from a trust fund that I have. But my ex told me that this was not about money. She proved this point when she paid two women to state that I had abused my children. These women committed perjury. All one has to do is examine my child. But that is still not good enough in Israel."

Marcus continues: "Child welfare, which practices blatant gender bias discrimination, suggested that I seek a forensic psychologist who can determine if any abuse actually took place. What they didn't tell me was that it was going to cost thousands of dollars. What father in Israel, who is paying child support, has thousands of dollars laying around? This is a poor country - one in three children live in poverty. Fathers lose their rights as parents and then are forced to find money for attorneys and forensic psychologists. Even if the father is able to find the moneys for these professionals, months go by that we do not see, hug or care for our children. PAS - parental alienation syndrome sets in. The children lose interest in a father that they do not see and fathers are harassed into finding a comfort zone free of private detectives and threats of prison. But there are many of us who will simply not give up. Our love for our children is stronger than steel and we will not allow our children to become victims of a psychotic mother. Every child deserves and needs both parents. Joint custody and equal, shared parenting urgently need to become the norms of Israel society."

One newly formed organization in Israel - The Coalition for Family - is planning to address how easy it is to remove fathers of their basic human rights in Israel with a simple claim of child abuse with no evidenced offered. They are planning with Fathers 4 Justice Israel to being in Geneva next month to lay witness at the UN Council on the Welfare of Children.

"I am now in the US trying to make my way home to Israel," says Marcus. My brother who controls my Trust fund has turned his back on me while the Rabbi of his Temple has provided me with emergency moneys for a forensic psychologist to clear my name. I can see the light at the end of the tunnel." 

Marcus concludes: "When my name is proved clean, it will mean that someone has been lying. Will that mother be dealt with for emotionally abusing her child? Will the family courts of Israel protect the child from that kind of behavior? Can the family courts and child welfare be able to determine if charges of child abuse are real or false in a matter of days - not months or years?"

Whether it is a suicide bombers belt going off or going to a school to pick up your child and being told that you can't - both are massacres of love and relationships that can never be replaced.

The above news content was edited and SEO optimized in Israel by the Leyden Digital PR SEO New Media Group - Israel, New York.

Internet Marketing SEO Professionals ask:
Can People Find Your Website?

ISRAEL NEWS AGENCY

Sponsored byxxxxxx IsraelSEOPr.comNewYorkDigitalPr.com

Hosted by