Friday, October 16, 2009

UN Goldstone Report: Israel Has No Right To Defend Herself

UN Goldstone Report: Israel Has No Right To Defend Herself

The UN Goldstone Report states that Hamas terrorists have a right to "resist" by attacking Israeli civilian populations.
By Joel Leyden
Israel News Agency

Jerusalem, Israel ---- October 14, 2009 ..... On September 15, 2009 the United Nations News Centre declared: "the Goldstone fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict at the start of this year has found evidence that both Israel forces and Palestinian militants committed serious war crimes and breaches of humanitarian law, which may amount to crimes against humanity."
“We came to the conclusion, on the basis of the facts we found, that there was strong evidence to establish that numerous serious violations of international law, both humanitarian law and human rights law, were committed by Israel during the military operations in Gaza,” said the head of the mission, Justice Richard Goldstone.

“The mission concluded that actions amounting to war crimes and possibly, in some respects, crimes against humanity, were committed by the Israel Defense Force (IDF),” concluded Goldstone.

The 575-page UN report, created by a four-member panel led by the South African judge Richard Goldstone, details evidence of so called war crimes committed by Israel.

The UN Human Rights Council will discuss the Goldstone report in a special session. The debate in Geneva is set for Thursday, the day after the UN Security Council in New York is scheduled to discuss the report.

Eighteen of 47 Human Rights Council member states approved a motion to hold the special session, the sixth time the council has singled out Israel in a special session in its three-year existence.

The UN Goldstone Report debate on the Israel defense against Hamas terror missile attacks is expected to last into Friday.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon expressed his support for reopening the debate on the report in a telephone call to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

A vote on the report in the Human Rights Council was postponed until March at the request of the Palestinian representative. Abbas has said he authorized the postponement in order to gain support for a vote to send the report on to the Security Council for action, which could include charges filed with the International Court of Justice.

Israel MK Danny Danon attacked the UN Goldstone report today during a speech in Knesset and ripped up a synopsis of it."Anti-Semitism has become a swear word even within this institution MKs went to Durban in order to speak out against Israel," Danon said. "They found a loyal partner by the name of Goldstone. All 600 pages should be thrown into the garbage can of history."

The UN Goldstone Report effectively ignores Israel basic right of self defense, makes unsubstantiated claims about its intent and challenges Israel's democratic values and rule of law.
At the same time the UN Goldstone Report all but ignores the deliberate strategy of the internationally recognized terror group Hamas of operating within and behind the civilian population and turning densely populated areas into an arena of battle. By turning a blind eye to such tactics it effectively rewards them.

In the words of Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaking at the UN: "what we are witnessing here is a double war crime by Palestinian terrorists. That Hamas fires over 8,000 missiles at Israel civilian cities and towns and does so hiding behind the Palestinian population in Gaza, using men, women and children as human shields."

The UN Goldstone Report troubled many distinguished individuals, including former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson, who refused invitations to head the Mission and admitted that the UN Goldstone Report was "guided not by human rights but by politics".

"The UN Human Rights Council and the Goldstone Report are either biased or mistaken in some of their fundamental accusations against Israel," said B'Tselem human rights group director Jessica Montell.She said the council was wrong in its gravest accusations against Israel.
These include the claim that Israel intentionally targeted the civilian population rather than Hamas, and the "weak, hesitant way that the report mentions Hamas's strategy of using civilians [in combat].""There's no question that the HRC, which mandated the UN Goldstone Report, has an inappropriate, disproportionate fixation with Israel," she said. She added that the council was "a political body made up of diplomats, not human rights experts, which means that the powerful states are never going to come under scrutiny the way the powerless will. So China, Russia and the US will never have commissions of inquiry, regardless of how their crimes rank relative to Israel crimes."

The implications of the UN Goldstone Report are against what Israel is trying to achieve, which is peaceful coexistence with the Palestinians. Ths Israel Foreign Ministry has stated that any action taken on this UN report, unfortunately, is going to have a detrimental effect on the peace process, if not, indeed, striking it a mortal blow. First of all, if Israel is trying to engage with the Palestinians to achieve something, we cannot be under constant attack by the very same Palestinians. Attacks today can be implemented with grenades or bullets or with words. And sometimes words - and we know this from history - can be more dangerous than bullets.

So the Palestinians, with all due respect, cannot hold sticks in both hands. They cannot just try and dialogue with us and talk about peaceful coexistence and a two-state solution and, on the other hand, keep attacking us. Whether the attack is militarily, economically or politically, there is no difference. Today the attacks in the international arena, whether it's New York or Geneva or anywhere else, are just as bad. Everything ties together in a campaign of trying to delegitimize Israel and to push us into a corner and create more pressure. This will not work.

But there is another implication here, which is, how this government of Israel or how any future government of Israel can have any flexibility in the future to make concessions to the Palestinians and take further risks. Israel has been taking enormous risks in the pullout of Gaza, in what's actually happening in the West Bank, where we removed more than two-thirds of the checkpoints and roadblocks and in trying to really push the Palestinian economy forward. And if, with all these risks, there is no reciprocity from the Palestinian side, but further attacks, I don't think there will be any basis here for continuing any dialogue with the Palestinians.

And this is something which is very, very important to realize because what we are trying to engage in with the Palestinians is difficult enough, complex enough, emotionally-laden enough, problematic enough, to add a real blow to any basis of trust that we are trying to build with the Palestinians. And without any trust, whether it's on the political level or the operational level, it is also very important to note that in order to create a Palestinian state, which I would say now most Israelis believe in, you need to have not only the trust of the leaders and the trust of the public, but also cooperation between the professionals, whether military or otherwise, on both sides.
This, now, is nonexistent. Certainly the Palestinians, people in the Palestinian Authority, members of Fatah, who are the ones who are actually pushing us to do away with Hamas, are now trying to push us and take us into these international courts and everything that come along with that.
This is something which has global effect, especially where the international community, at this point, is engaged in a very bitter struggle against extremists, against fanatics, whether it's in Afghanistan, whether it's in Kashmir, whether it's in Iraq or any other place around the globe. So this is something which concerns each and every country, certainly all democracies, certainly all decent countries with the rule of law.

The UN Goldstone Report all but ignores the deliberate terrorist strategy of operating in the heart of densely populated civilian areas which dictated the arena of battle. Even when the Hamas terrorists mixed among civilians, the Report rejects the notion that there was an intention to put the civilian population at risk.

The UN Goldstone Report also ignores Israel's extensive efforts, even in the midst of fighting, to maintain humanitarian standards. While it does, reluctantly, acknowledge Israel's "significant efforts" to issue warnings before attacks, it does not find any of these efforts to be effective
While the UN Goldstone Report passes judgment against Israel in respect of almost any allegation, it seeks to absolve the Hamas of almost any wrongdoing.
The word "terrorist" is almost entirely absent. IDF Soldier Gilad Shalit, now held incommunicado in captivity for over three years, was "captured during an enemy incursion" and the Hamas members that the Mission met with in Gaza are thanked as the "Gaza authorities" for extending their full cooperation and support to the Mission.

Even the thousands of terror rocket attacks against Israelis which necessitated the Gaza Operation are given the most cursory treatment, and indeed the Report indirectly blames Israel even for these by terming them "'reprisals".

"The Goldstone committee is a committee that was set up to find Israel guilty of crimes that were determined in advanced, and the committee's members did not let the facts confuse them," said Israel Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, in his comments in response to the harsh UN report investigation the events of Israel Defense Forces Operation Cast Lead.
Lieberman said the committee's conclusions were predetermined, and he accused its members of serving the purposes of utilitarian countries. "The whole purpose of the report, from the moment the decision was made to write it, was to destroy Israel's image, in service of countries where the terms 'human rights' and 'combat ethics' do not even appear in their dictionaries," the foreign minister alleged.
Lieberman went on to say, "I can say wholeheartedly, as can any man that examines the matter in an objective manner, that the IDF is the most moral army in the world, and it is forced to deal with the most vile terrorists, who set for themselves the goal of killing women and children, and hide behind women and children."

Israel President Shimon Peres responded to the UN Goldstone Report saying that it "makes a mockery of history" and that "it does not distinguish between the aggressor and the defender."
"War is crime and the attacker is the criminal. The defender has no choice. The Hamas terror organization is the one who started the war and also carried out other awful crimes. Hamas has used terrorism for years against Israeli children," said Peres."The report gives de facto legitimacy to terrorist initiatives and ignores the obligation and right of every country to defend itself, as the UN itself had clearly stated."

"The effect, if not the intent, of the Goldstone report will be to keep Israel troops in the West Bank longer," says Harvard Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz.

"President Obama was right when he said that "the first job of any nation is to protect its citizens." The UN Goldstone report has made it virtually impossible for the Israel army to protect its citizens against rocket attacks from territory that is no longer militarily occupied. It encourages Israel's enemies to provoke Israeli self-defense measures, which they know will produce condemnation of the Jewish state.
This is a great tragedy, for Israelis, for Palestinians and for all who favor a two-state solution and an end to the occupation."

Israel Defense Minister Ehud Barak spoke today with a number of European officials ahead of a UN debate on the Goldstone Report. Barak spoke to the foreign ministers of France, Spain and the UK and called on them to ignore the Goldstone report because it is "twisted, fraudulent, and tendentious, and encourages terror".

While the Goldstone Report is being debated in Geneva tomorrow, the Israel government will focus on the explosion that occurred at a Hezbollah member's house in Tyre, Lebanon this week illustrating Hezbollah's violation of UN Resolution 1701 that ended the Second Lebanon War.

Israel Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon placed the UN Goldstone Report in clear perspective.
"This report not only takes away the right to self-defense from democracies, it gives this self-defense to the terrorists," said Ayalon.
"Because, as we speak, Hamas in Gaza is getting more ammunition and more equipment, making more terrorism plans and more fortifications, and is waiting to see the results in Geneva or in New York. And that could easily give Hamas and organizations like Hamas, whether it's Islamic Jihad or Al-Qaida or any other terror organizations, the tools to really continue hitting civilian targets and democracies with impunity basically, or without any recourse."



The above news content was edited and SEO optimized in London and Israel for the Internet by the Leyden Communications Internet Marketing PR SEO Group London SEO Pr New York SEO Pr - Israel, London, New York.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

קידום אתרים יחסי ציבור SEO

קידום אתרים, יחסי ציבור בינלאומיים לעסקים ישראלים

יחסי ציבור בינלאומיים / שיווק באינטרנט / ייעוץ לקידום אתרים (SEO) של מסחר אלקטרוני

האם הלקוחות הפוטנציאליים שלך יכולים למצוא אותך במנועי החיפוש?

חברת ליידן תקשורת היא בעלת נסיון של יותר מ-25 שנים בשיווק בין-לאומי והיא חברת ה-SEO (קידום אתרים) המובילה בישראל בתחום השיווק באינטרנט, קידום אתרים במנועי חיפוש ושירותי ייעוץ לעסקים אלקטרוניים.

חברת ליידן עובדת עם מודעות המילים של גוגל (Adwords) בהצבה של מילות מפתח של גוגל למטרות של SEO (קידום אתרים) בישראל וברחבי העולם. העובדים והמנהלים במשרד ה-SEO (קידום אתרים) של ליידן הם אנגלוסקסים שאנגלית היא שפת אמם ותרבותם , תכונה שהיא קריטית במסעות שיווק באינטרנט SEO (קידום אתרים) בישראל וברחבי העולם.


קידום אתרים במנוע חיפוש - SEO

(קידום אתרים) הוא ראשי תיבות שפירושם אופטימיזציה עבור מנועי חיפוש . זהו תהליך שבו כמות המבקרים באתר האינטרנט הולך וגדל באמצעות דירוג גובה יותר של האתר בתוצאות של מנועי החיפוש. ככל שאתר מדורג גבוה יותר בתוצאות החיפוש כך גדל הסיכוי שגולשים יבקרו באתר. גולשים באינטרנט אינם נוהגים לעבור מדף תוצאות אחד לשני ומשום כך הדירוג של האתר בתוצאות החיפוש הוא קריטי על מנת להפנות אליו תנועת גולשים גדולה יותר. השימוש ב - SEO (קידום אתרים) תורם לכך שהאתר יהיה זמין ונגיש למנוע החיפוש, והוא משפר את הסיכויים שמנוע החיפוש ימצא את האתר. היחסים בין מומחה שיווק באינטרנט באמצעות SEO (קידום אתרים) וחברת גוגל הם מיוחדים מאד. מומחה SEO (קידום אתרים) לומד, לאחר שנים של נסיון, כיצד גוגל ומנועי חיפוש אחרים משתמשים במילות מפתח , קישורים ותכנות כדי להביא אל הגולש את תוצאות החיפוש הכי רלוונטיות עבורו.

גוגל איננה מתירה הצפה (spamming) ואמצעים לא-אתיים אחרים כדי להשיג דירוג גבוה של מילות מפתח. אם אתה עובד כמומחה שיווק באינטרנט באמצעות SEO (קידום אתרים) כדאי שתקרא את קוד ההתנהגות של גוגל בקישור הזה.

חברת ליידן היא החברה המובילה בישראל בתחום השיווק באינטרנט באמצעות SEO (קידום אתרים).


שיווק באינטרנט

כיצד להשיג תנועה רבה יותר באתר הישראלי שלך באמצעות שיטות שונות של שיווק באינטרנט, כולל פרסום בחינם ובתשלום.

תוכנת קידום אתרים

תוכנה ומוצרים נוספים באינטרנט יכולים להפוך רבים ממשימות השיווק באינטרנט לאוטומאטיים.

שיווק באמצעות הדואר האלקטרוני

הדואר האלקטרוני הוא אחד מהאמצעים היעילים ביותר לקידום אתרים, אך גם זה הסובל מחוסר ההבנה הרב ביותר. למד להשתמש בדוא"ל ככלי רב- עוצמה לשיווק באינטרנט.

קידום אתרים באינטרנט באמצעות SEO (קידום אתרים)

דרכים יעילות להשיג דירוג גבוה במנועי החיפוש במחירים נמוכים.

טיפים לקידום אתרים

ייעוץ מקצועי כיצד לנצח את היריבים שלך ועצות "עשה" ו "אל תעשה" נוספות בנוגע לקידום אתר האינטרנט הישראלי שלך.

הבטחות , הבטחות - המיתוס הגדול של הגשת אתרים למנועי החיפוש

אתם מכירים את המיתוס, נכון? זה שאומר "השתמשו בשירותי ה-SEO (קידום אתרים) שלנו על מנת להגיש את האתר שלכם למנועי החיפוש, והגולשים מיד יגיעו בהמוניהם!"

אך מה הן העובדות כשמדברים על הגשה למנועי

חיפוש?

SEO (קידום אתרים) באמצעות הגשה למנועי החיפוש היא דרך נהדרת להגדיל את תנועת הגולשים באתר שלך אבל רק אם אתה מצליח לדרג את האתר שלך בין עשרת הראשונים. היו לנו אתרים שנכללו בעשרת הראשונים שהצליחו להגיע לאלפי מבקרים ביום. לעומת זאת, היו לנו אתרים מחוץ לעשירייה הראשונה שהצליחו לקבל רק מאה מבקרים ואפילו פחות מכך ליום. וברוב המקרים - פחות מכך.

אז איך משיגים דירוג בעשירייה הראשונה?

זה לא קל, אחרת לא הייתם קוראים את המסמך הזה. כמעט כל כלי להגשת אתרים למנועי החיפוש הנמכר היום יגיש את האתר שלך למנועי החיפוש (חלקם יגישו אותו לאלפי מנועים) אך שנינו יודעים שהגשה לבדה אין בה כדי להבטיח דירוג גבוה.

עליך לבקש יותר משריות הגשת אתרים SEO (קידום אתרים) מקצועי !

רוב הכלים להגשת אתרים וקישורים עושים רק את זה - מגישים. חברת ליידן מציעה לך הרבה, הרבה יותר מזה. אתה יודע שזה לא מספיק רק להגיש את האתר ולקוות שיהיה לך דירוג גבוה. שירות השיווק באינטרנט והגשה למנועי החיפוש שלנו מציע מערך שלם של נסיון וכלים שכולם חיוניים להשגת דירוג גבוה. לא תמצא את השירותים הללו במסגרת השירותים הניתנים ע"י מעצבי ובוני אתרים בישראל. אנחנו דוברים את השפה הבין-לאומית של האינטרנט, של מסחר ועסקים אלקטרוניים - אנגלית. והיכולת שלנו לשלב בקפדנות את האנגלית השיווקית שלנו במנועי החיפוש היא שהופכת את עבודת השיווק באינטרנט שלנו לכל כך חזקה. המומחים היחידים למנועי חיפוש עם אחריות אמיתית בישראל!

מה אם אני אומר ששירותי השיווק באינטרנט SEO (קידום אתרים) שלנו מבטיחים דירוג בעשירייה הראשונה בתוצאות של מנועי החיפוש - או שאתם לא משלמים? מה אם אני אוסיף ואומר שבשונה מכל שירות דומה בשוק הישראלי, לנו יש צוות תמיכה שלם העומד לרשותך לאורך כל התהליך במטרה להבטיח שהאתר שלך נכנס למנועי החיפוש - ומהר?

דע את העובדות אודות הגשת אתרים למנועי

החיפוש!

בכל מקרה, ייקח לך זמן מה עד שתגיע לדירוג בעשירייה הראשונה, אולי חודשיים- שלושה (בגלל שכל כך הרבה אנשים מגישים את האתרים שלהם מדי יום, לוקח למנועי החיפוש בין 4-8 שבועות לקטלג אתר). בידיעה שזו המציאות, האין זה מוזר שרוב כלי ההגשה מציעים החזר כספי לאחר 30 יום? הרי, אין לך מספיק זמן לבחון האם התוכנה עובדת או לא!

ההתחייבות המלאה שלנו לשיווק באינטרנט

ההתחייבות שלנו פשוטה מאד. אנחנו נותנים לך להשתמש בשירותים שלנו במשך ששה חודשים, ללא כל סיכון, במטרה להשיג דירוג בעשירייה הראשונה. בזמן הזה אנחנו מציעים לך נגישות מלאה לצוות התמיכה שלנו. החברה' האלה נמצאים שם מסיבה אחת בלבד - לעזור לך להגיע לדירוג בעשירייה הראשונה בכל דרך שהם יכולים. בכל רגע במהלך חצי השנה הזו, אם אתה מחליט שהשירותים שלנו לא שווים את המחיר המקצועי הנמוך והאתר שלך לא מדורג בעשרת הראשונים, אנחנו נחזיר לך את מלוא כספך.

האם תנצלו הצעה מיוחדת זו עוד היום?

אתה חייב את זה לעצמך שייראו את האתר שלך. מאחר שאתה בוודאי יכול למצוא חברה ישראלית שנהנתה מהשירותים שלנו (כולל צבא ההגנה לישראל) אין שום סיבה שלא תיצור אתנו קשר היום. האם תקח את קידום האתר שלך בידיים? האם תיצור אתנו קשר היום?

שיווק באינטרנט בישראל מגביר את תנועת

הגולשים ואת ההכנסות. השיווק באינטרנט הוא חיוני לעסק שלך.

השקעת הרבה זמן וכסף בבניית אתר עסקים אלקטרוני.

אבל - האם אנשים ימצאו אותו? האם מנועי החיפוש יאתרו אותו? האם תופיע בעשרים האתרים הראשונים? האם תופיע בכלל?

קדם את האתר שלך היום - ותתחיל להזרים גולשים אל העסק שלך.

צור קשר עם חברת ליידן המספקת שירותי שיווק באינטרנט, שירות SEO (קידום אתרים) וקידום אתרים כדי להבטיח דירוג גבוה ברשת!

שאל אודות הסמינרים שלנו לשיווק באינטרנט, חקר קידום האתרים ברשת, מקרי מבחן בתחום המחסר והעסקים האלקטרוניים ופתרונות שיווק באמצעות הדואר האלקטרוני. הגדל את הלקוחות הפוטנציאליים, התפוצה, נתח השוק וההכנסות עוד היום!


Friday, October 9, 2009

US NASA Missile Slams Moon, Warning For Iran By US, Israel On Nuclear Weapons?

US NASA Missile Slams Moon, Warning For Iran By US, Israel On Nuclear Weapons?




By Joel Leyden
Israel News Agency
http://www.israelnewsagency.com/usnasamissilerocketsmooniranisraelnuclearweaponsbarackobamanobelpeaceprizebenjaminnetanyahuidfislamicterrorismstarwars48091009.html

Jerusalem, Israel ---- October 9, 2009 ..... It definitely sounded innocent enough. NASA in a search to discover if there's water on the moon, bombed the moon today with a rocket weighing some 2.2 tons, carrying the destructive force equivalent that of 1.5 tons of dynamite.

In pre-dawn hours, a US spacecraft punched a deep hole in the moon's south pole to find out whether ice is hidden in a crater that hasn't seen sunlight in billions of years. Two rockets hit the moon at more than twice the speed of a bullet.

As rumors started to spread out on the Internet asking "who did the risk assessment?" and "we're not risking sending the solar system out of balance?" these words were quickly neutralized.

Bruce Betts, director of projects at The Planetary Society , said in an email to Computerworld that this morning's moon crashes would have no negative impact on the moon or the Earth.

"The spacecraft are far too tiny compared to the moon, in fact, to have any significant effect on the moon's orbit or dynamics," he added. "The impact might be likened to a gnat hitting the windshield of a truck."

While millions from the US, UK, Mexico and Japan to Canada, France, Israel and China watched their TV sets for any sign of an explosion on the moon, there was very little chatter on the Internet about a 79-million USD message being sent to Iran and other Islamic terror nations and groups.

Any student of history knows that space exploration as we know it, did not have it origins in a Buck Rogers American science fiction adventure. But rather as Russia, at the urging of their Ministry of Defense, launched the Sputnik satellite on October 4, 1957. And the US responded. Although on July 29, 1955, US President Dwight Eisenhower announced that the US would launch an artificial satellite, they failed to be first. The US defense establishment then set it sights as being the first to place a man on the moon and succeeded on July 20,1969.

This has been labeled as the great space race, it has been nothing more and nothing less as to which nation will control the skies with weapons. Ronald Reagan enhanced this drama with his "Star Wars" program.

The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) was a proposal by former US President Ronald Reagan on March 23, 1983 to use space-based systems to protect the US from attack by strategic nuclear ballistic missiles. The initiative focused on strategic defense rather than the prior strategic offense doctrine of mutual assured destruction (MAD). The Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO) was set up in 1984 within the United States Department of Defense to oversee the Strategic Defense Initiative.


The US, deep in economic recession, is spending 79 million dollars to
find moon water or defending herself from a nuclear Iran?

Just days ago the Pentagon acknowledged that it had moved up the date for deployment of a massive bomb capable of penetrating deeply buried enemy facilities. Most believe the weapon is designed for a possible attack on Iran nuclear facilities, but officials will not make that connection.

It is officially called the Massive Ordnance Penetrator. Informally it is referred to as a new and larger type of Bunker Buster. It weighs more than 13 metric tons. The US Defense Department will not confirm its capabilities, but analysts believe it is designed to penetrate up to 60 meters of earth, or a thick layer of concrete, before exploding.

Last month US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said an attack against Iran would only "buy time," delaying Tehran's dispute nuclear program by about three years.

That same month Iran conceded that it had begun building a new uranium enrichment facility near the holy city of Qom.

With Iran threatening to "wipe Israel off the map" former Israel Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and present Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have reportedly been asking the US for a green light to attack Iran nuclear weapon building facilities.

There are three locations where Iran facilities are producing elements for nuclear weapons.

Israel officials named these sites as: Natanz, where thousands of centrifuges produce enriched uranium; Isfahan, where 250 tons of gas are stores in tunnels; and Arak, where a heavy water reactor produces plutonium.

Netanyahu called Iran "the major terrorist-sponsoring state of our time. He says that Tehran "could give those nuclear weapons to terrorists or give them a nuclear umbrella that would bring terrorism beyond our wildest dreams."

"Although Twitter and Facebook are quite less expensive and dramatic, this 79-million dollar bombing of the moon leaves no doubt in anyone's mind that if the US cares to destroy Iran nuclear facilities which are buried deep underground, they have the proven capability of doing so from outer space," says an Israel security analyst.

"If Israel was forced to go it alone it could use low-yield nuclear “bunker-busters”, but it appears that the US and Israel are very much on the same page when it comes to a nuclear Iran. The US will not allow it and is making it very clear that they want Iran to stand down. It's ironic that on the same day that US President Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize, he gave the order to use the moon for target practice. But it just might be that this new, potent precision US weapon in space which may ultimately keep the peace in the Middle-East and beyond."


The above news content was edited and SEO optimized in London and Israel for the Internet by the Leyden Communications Internet Marketing PR SEO Group London SEO Pr New York SEO Pr - Israel, London, New York.




Support Israel with a Birthday Card!

Internet Marketing SEO Professionals ask:
Can People Find Your Website?

ISRAEL NEWS AGENCY

Friday, October 2, 2009

UN Goldstone Gaza Report

UN Goldstone Gaza Report

Response to Un Goldstone Report:

Mary Robinson: "I am afraid the resolution is not balanced ... This is unfortunately a practice by the Council: adopting resolutions guided not by human rights but by politics. This is very regrettable." (Le Temps, 4 February 2009).

More>>


Israel Analysis and Comments on the
UN GOLDSTONE GAZA FACT FINDING MISSION REPORT
September 2009

Israel is appalled and disappointed by the UN Goldstone Report published on 15 September 2009 by the UN Gaza Fact Finding Mission. The UN Goldstone Report effectively ignores Israel right of self defense, makes unsubstantiated claims about its intent and challenges Israel's democratic values and rule of law.

At the same time the UN Goldstone Report all but ignores the deliberate strategy of the internationally recognized terror group Hamas of operating within and behind the civilian population and turning densely populated areas into an arena of battle. By turning a blind eye to such tactics it effectively rewards them.

The UN Goldstone Report barely disguises its goal of instigating a political campaign against Israel, and in its recommendations seeks to involve the Security Council, the UN General Assembly the International Criminal Court, the Human Rights Council, and the entire international community in such a campaign.


Featured Sites:

Association for Human Rights in Israel

Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Israel Defense Forces

HonestReporting.com

Israel21c

Israel News Agency

Goldstone Israel Gaza UN Report (pdf)

Israel PM at the UN: "Have you no shame?"

Netanyahu reminds world that England when attacked by Nazi rockets leveled cities in Europe, while Israel went house to house in Gaza.
Why was Israel, the defender, condemned?
Why did the UN not condemn the terror group Hamas for firing rockets at Israel cities and towns?

The Mandate of the UN Mission

The one-sided mandate of the UN Gaza Fact Finding Mission, and the resolution established it, gave serious reasons for concern both to Israel and to the many states on the Council which refused to support it - including the member states of the European Union, Switzerland, Canada, Korea and Japan.

It also troubled many distinguished individuals, including former High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson, who refused invitations to head the Mission and admitted that it was "guided not by human rights but by politics".

The Conduct of the UN Mission

These concerns were exacerbated by the conduct of the UN Mission itself, including reports in the Palestinian media that, throughout its visits to Gaza, it was continuously accompanied by Hamas officials and its refusal to recuse members of the mission with clear political views on the issues under investigation. One mission member signed a letter to the Sunday Times saying that Israel's actions against Hamas attacks were acts of "aggression not self-defense", prejudging the investigation before it had even begun.
The unprecedented holding of telecast hearings also gave cause for concern. The fact that all the witnesses were prescreened and selected, and none were asked questions relating to any Palestinian terrorist activity or the location of weaponry and terrorists in civilian areas only supports concerns that they were part of an orchestrated political campaign.

A "non-judicial" document

Justice Goldstone as Head of the UN Mission repeatedly insisted that the Mission was not a judicial inquiry and so "could not reach judicial conclusions". On this basis that he justified the inclusion of partisan mission members, admitting that their involvement "would not be appropriate for a judicial inquiry'. The UN Goldstone Report however is highly judicial in nature, reaching conclusive judicial determinations of guilt, and including 'detailed legal findings' even in the absence of the sensitive intelligence information which Israel did not feel able to provide. These determinations are made notwithstanding the Report's admission that it does not "pretend to reach the standard of proof applicable in criminal trials".

Elements Ignored by the UN Goldstone Report

The UN Goldstone Report all but ignores the deliberate terrorist strategy of operating in the heart of densely populated civilian areas which dictated the arena of battle. Even when the Hamas terrorists mixed among civilians, the Report rejects the notion that there was an intention to put the civilian population at risk.

Astonishingly, despite the many widely reported instances in the international press of the abuse of civilian facilities by terrorist groups, and the statements of Hamas own leaders praising women and children who acted as human shields, the UN Goldstone Report repeatedly stated that it could find no evidence of such activities. This, even despite its admission that those interviewed were "reluctant to speak about the presence or conduct of hostilities by the Palestinian armed groups".

The UN Goldstone Report also ignores Israel's extensive efforts, even in the midst of fighting, to maintain humanitarian standards. While it does, reluctantly, acknowledge Israel's "significant efforts" to issue warnings before attacks, it does not find any of these efforts to be effective

While the UN Goldstone Report passes judgment against Israel in respect of almost any allegation, it seeks to absolve the Hamas of almost any wrongdoing. The word "terrorist" is almost entirely absent. IDF Soldier Gilad Shalit, now held incommunicado in captivity for over three years, was "captured during an enemy incursion" and the Hamas members that the Mission met with in Gaza are thanked as the "Gaza authorities" for extending their full cooperation and support to the Mission.

Even the thousands of terror rocket attacks against Israelis which necessitated the Gaza Operation are given the most cursory treatment, and indeed the Report indirectly blames Israel even for these by terming them "'reprisals".

Rejection of democratic values

In a Report which relies so heavily on Israel human rights organizations and which also petitions on sensitive security issues to Israel's Supreme Court the Report devotes considerable attention to "repression of dissent in Israel". It bases this assertion in large part on the widespread support for the military operation in the Israel public, assuming that Israel has "created a political climate in which dissent is not tolerated. The notion that the majority of Israelis genuinely supported action to bring years of continuous rocket and missile attacks against Israeli civilians to an end does not appear to have occurred to the members of the Mission.

The UN Goldstone Report is also critical of Israel internal investigations even though these compare favorably to investigations of allegations in military matters in most western countries, and have regularly resulted in criminal investigations and convictions.

Recommendations

The UN Goldstone Report's recommendations are as one-sided as its findings. It seeks to harness the Human Rights Council, the Security Council the General Assembly, the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court and the international community as parts of its hostile political campaign.

Despite token recommendations in respect of the Palestinian side, all the international pressure is directed solely against Israel.

The true test of such a Report can only be whether in future conflicts it will have the effect of increasing or decreasing respect for the rule of law. Regrettably a one-sided report of this nature, claiming to represent international law, can only weaken the standing of law in future conflicts. At the same time, it will broadcast a deeply troubling message to terrorist groups wherever they are that the cynical tactics of seeking to exploit civilian suffering for political ends actually pays dividends.

Israel President Shimon Peres has slammed the Goldstone Commission's report on IDF Operation Cast Lead, saying it "makes a mockery of history and fails to distinguish between aggressor and those acting in self-defense."
Peres claimed the commission members would not have written such a report, which accuses Israel of war crimes, "had their children been living in Sderot, Israel under the constant threat of Hamas rockets."
The Israel President blames Hamas for launching the war, stating the terror group had committed numerous horrendous war crimes, and stressed that Israel had to defend itself.

"Hamas carried out attacks against the children of Israel, detonating bombs in city centers, hurting civilians, firing more than 12,000 rockets and mortar shells at innocent civilians with one clear aim - to kill," he wrote in a statement.
The UN Goldstone Report legitimizes terrorism, shooting and killing, while ignoring every state's right and obligation to self-defense, which are clearly anchored in the UN charter, Peres wrote.

The Israel president went on to recall Israel's disengagement from Gaza and Hamas's bloody takeover of the Strip.

"Israel removed all of its troops and citizens from the Gaza Strip, opened the border crossings and helped construction in the Strip - the Israeli occupation in Gaza ended. But after Israel completed the disengagement from Gaza, a murderous and illegitimate terror group took control over the Strip and threw out the legitimate Fatah leadership.

"While Hamas continued to fire rockets, Israel used diplomatic efforts, including many appeals to the UN, to bring about a cease fire. Instead of building Gaza and caring for the welfare of its citizens, Hamas built tunnels to attack Israel, cruelly using children and innocent Palestinians to hide terrorists and ammunition," he wrote.

The state of Israel had to defend itself, as would any other country in the world, Peres stressed, adding that "those who criticized Israel did not propose any other way of stopping the rocket fire."

The Israel president recalled how "Israel has been criticized for its actions against Hizbullah terror attacks from Lebanon and Hamas attacks from the Gaza Strip, as well as for building the security barrier in the West Bank to prevent suicide bombers from entering the country.

"This criticism did not stop the rockets from hitting the South and the North, nor did it stop terrorists from blowing themselves up in our central cities," wrote Peres. "The IDF's actions are what have brought economical prosperity to the West Bank and have enabled Gazans to have normal lives again," he concluded.

Also responding to the UN report, Israel Ambassador to the UN Gabriela Shalev said that it would hamper Middle East peace efforts.

Speaking to Israel Army Radio, Shalev added that "the international atmosphere is very influential. We have already begun a public diplomacy campaign in world capitals in order to explain the extent to which the report is biased, one-sided and political."

Israel Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon said Jerusalem made the right decision not to cooperate with the inquiry.

"The report only came out because of countries like Pakistan, Libya and Saudi Arabia, who are members of the UN Human Rights Council," Ayalon told Army Radio. "The results just prove the correctness and legitimacy of the decision not to cooperate.... The report was compiled without any connection to investigations on the ground."

"It completely ignores all Hamas terror activity that preceded the IDF operation," he continued, stressing that the main reason for Israel's boycott of the investigation "was the presence on the commission of those who insisted that the operation was not one of self-defense, but an Israeli aggressive action."

Ayalon said that Israel would now focus its energy on "making the report dissipate" and that Jerusalem was in contact with the US over the findings, emphasizing that the report could have repercussions for American troops fighting in Iran and Afghanistan.

"We must remember that all Western nations opposed the inquiry commission, and our work with the Europeans and Americans can prevent the consequences," he said, asserting that the report would have negative effects on efforts for Israeli-Palestinian peace and normalization between Jerusalem and the Arab world.

Ayalon concluded that there was "no one better" than Israel Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman to lead the campaign against the report and put Israel's side across.
Israel former ambassador to the UN, Danny Gillerman, said that the UN Human Rights Council report contained "blatant, one-sided, anti-Israel lies."

"Members of the UNHRC include countries like Zimbabwe and Libya that spend 90 percent of their time on Israel and don't deal, for example, with the Darfur massacre," he told Army Radio.

Gillerman also said that the UNHRC should never have been set up in the first place.
"We and the US were only ones who voted against the body being established. We knew it would be very one-sided and anti-Israeli," he said, adding that former UN secretary-general Kofi Annan had said that allowing the UNHRC's establishment was one of his biggest mistakes.

Gillerman said Israel was right not to cooperate with the inquiry, saying, "The findings would never have been objective."

He stressed that while soul searching was being done by Israel and would continue, Operation Cast Lead was conducted to protect a million southerners from rocket attacks.
"We went to lengths no other country would have gone to in order to avoid civilian casualties," he went on, adding that the IDF embarked on an operation any other country would have carried out under the circumstances, but that other militaries would have caused greater collateral damage.

On a positive note, Gillerman said that the Israel media was getting "more worked up" by the report than others. "I haven't seen other media outlets around the world dedicating so much time to the issue."

"The Goldstone committee is a committee that was set up to find Israel guilty of crimes that were determined in advanced, and the committee's members did not let the facts confuse them," said Israel Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, in his comments in response to the harsh UN report investigation the events of Israel Defense Forces Operation Cast Lead.

Lieberman said the committee's conclusions were predetermined, and he accused its members of serving the purposes of utilitarian countries. "The whole purpose of the report, from the moment the decision was made to write it, was to destroy Israel's image, in service of countries where the terms 'human rights' and 'combat ethics' do not even appear in their dictionaries," the foreign minister alleged. Lieberman went on to say, "I can say wholeheartedly, as can any man that examines the matter in an objective manner, that the IDF is the most moral army in the world, and it is forced to deal with the most vile terrorists, who set for themselves the goal of killing women and children, and hide behind women and children."

The Israel Foreign Minister further claimed that "the Goldstone Report wishes to take the UN back to the dark ages, where it was also determined, through the leadership of utilitarian countries, that Zionism is racism." He said, "The UN Goldstone Report has no legal, factual or ethical value, and more than a testament to the State of Israel, it is a testament to the writers of the report and those that sent them." Lieberman's response is one in a long line of censure and attacks against the report on the part of senior Israeli officials, which has been continuous since the report was published on Tuesday.

The officials' defensive response is meant to minimize possible damage the document could cause Israel, officials in office at the time of the operation, and senior officers in the IDF. It should be noted that the UN Goldstone committee ruled that some of the incidents of the Gaza war may carry with them personal criminal liability. Israel experts on international law have said this could lead to lawsuits against officials in various state in which the law allows it.

http://www.UNGoldstoneReport.com

Sponsored by:

The Association for Human Rights in Israel™

Produced by: Leyden Communications Group


FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains some copyrighted materials the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Israel leader Benjamin Netanyahu Blasts Iran, Holocaust Deniers As He Holds Aloft Auschwitz Documents

Israel leader Benjamin Netanyahu Blasts Iran, Holocaust Deniers As He Holds Aloft Auschwitz Documents

Here’s proof, Mahmoud!
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shows Nazi papers at UN detailing plans for Holocaust.
BY Richard Sisk
DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU

Thursday, September 24th 2009, 8:25 PM


At the same podium where Iran's Holocaust-denier stood the day before, Israel's prime minister held up the minutes of the Nazi meeting where the "final solution to the Jewish question" was agreed upon.

Then Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spread out the construction plans for the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camps signed by Reichsfuhrer Heinrich Himmler.

Netanyahu turned to his audience at the United Nations General Assembly and asked: "Is this a lie? This June, US President Obama visited the Buchenwald concentration camp. Did President Obama pay tribute to a lie?

"And what of the Auschwitz survivors whose arms still bear the tattooed numbers branded on them by the Nazis? Are those tattoos a lie?"

Netanyahu provided a dramatic rebuttal to the "systematic assault on the truth" launched by Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has called the Holocaust a myth.

The Israeli prime minister said the Iranian fanatic threatened to scuttle the UN's mission to promote peace and security.

Netanyahu commended delegations from the U.S. and other nations that walked out on Ahmadinejad's disjointed address Wednesday night calling Israel and the U.S. "warmongers."

"To those who gave this Holocaust-denier a hearing, I say on behalf of my people, the Jewish people, and decent people everywhere: Have you no shame? Have you no decency?

"What a disgrace! What a mockery of the charter of the United Nations! Perhaps, some of you think that this man and his odious regime threaten only the Jews.

"History has shown us time and again, that what starts with attacks on the Jews eventually ends up engulfing many others."


Israel, Saudi Arabia, US, UK Join Forces As Iran Fires Nuclear Capable Missiles

Israel, Saudi Arabia, US, UK Join Forces As Iran Fires Nuclear Capable Missiles
Israeli submarines patrol the seven seas with the most advanced weapons and INTEL systems. These subs guarantee a last strike option by Israel.

By Joel Leyden
Israel News Agency

Jerusalem, Israel ---- September 28, 2009 ..... As Iran test fires missiles on the Jewish Holy Day of Yom Kippur - nuclear missiles capable of hitting Israel, Saudi Arabia, Europe and US bases - Saudi Arabia has granted the use of their air space to Israel to take out Iran nuclear facilities.

According to the Daily Express, the director of England MI6 discussed a mutual defense against Iran in London with Israel Mossad Director Meir Dagan and security officials from Saudi Arabia. The meeting between the UK, Israel and the Saudis took place after British INTEL discovered the plant, in the side of a mountain near the ancient Iran city of Qom.

Diplomatic sources say that the Iran nuclear site could hold 3,000 centrifuges, capable of making enough enriched uranium to build a nuclear bomb each year.

The Iran second nuclear weapons producing site is seen as a real-time threat by Israel and Saudi Arabia.

John Bolton, America’s former UN ambassador, recently told a meeting of intelligence analysts that “Riyadh certainly approves” of Israel using of Saudi Arabia airspace for either air or missile ground to ground attacks against Iran.

As much of Israel was joining in prayer for their most sacred Jewish holiday, Yom Kippur, the Iran Revolutionary Guard successfully launched the Shahab-3 missile, which is capable of carrying a nuclear warhead and has a range of up to 1,200 miles. The Iran Shahab-3 missile would put Israel, most Arab states and parts of Europe, including much of Turkey, within its strike range.

Iran Defence Minister Ahmad Vahidi, afraid of an Israel military response today said: "If this happens, an attack by Israel, which of course we do not foresee, its ultimate result would be that it expedites the Zionist regime's last breath," said on state television.

Iran's foreign ministry spokesman Hassan Qashqavi said the missile tests were not a response to international pressure on the country's nuclear program. They were, he said, part of Sacred Defense Week's annual military exercises to commemorate Iran's war with Iraq in the 1980s.
Israel is prepared to use a preemptive military strike to stop Iran from developing an atomic weapon.

In 1981, Israel bombed a French-built nuclear plant near Iraq's capital, Baghdad, knowing that it was designed to make nuclear weapons to destroy Israel. It was the world's first air strike against a nuclear plant.
An undisclosed number of Israel Defense Forces F-15 interceptors and F-16 fighter bombers destroyed the Osirak reactor 18 miles south of Baghdad, on the orders of Israel Prime Minister Menachem Begin.

Iran, which says its nuclear work is for peaceful power generation, has often shrugged off the possibility of any such strikes.

Vahidi, a former Revolutionary Guards commander, said that in the event of an Israeli attack its "lifespan, which is today coming to an end, would be speeded up."
He added that the "Zionist regime", the term Iran uses for Israel, was on a "slope of destruction".
Iran's hardline president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has also repeatedly predicted Israel's downfall while denying that the Holocaust ever took place.

"Israel knew days before about today's launch of the Iran Shahab-3 missile," said an Israel security analyst. "They perceive Israel as weak and are probing the Israel Defense Forces and her allies reactions. This is nothing more and nothing less than psychological war fare operations by Iran. With the US, Canada, Western Europe, Russia and many Arab states now joining forces against Iran, Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is doing all he can to show the citizens of Iran that he is still in power."

"The Iran missile testing today was not for Israel, the US or Saudi Arabia consumption but produced for Iran TV where it was advertised, and shown over and over again to Iran citizens. Discontented and outraged citizens of Iran who had a recent election stolen from them. An election where they would have voted in democracy. All the same, Israel has remained on high alert before, during and after Yom Kippur through our powerful and experienced navy, air force and ground forces."

Israel IDF Chief of the General Staff Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi responded by saying that “the possibility of Iran becoming a nuclear power is a threat not only to the State of Israel, but for the Middle East and the entire free world.”

“We all understand that the best way of coping with Iran is through international sanctions. I hope that Iran will understand this. I think that if not, Israel has the right to defend itself, and all options are open. The IDF's working premise is that we have to be prepared for that possibility, and that is exactly what we are doing.”

This Yom Kippur news story was created by the Israel News Agency. The INA was created in 1995 to provide accurate and timely on-line news from Israel in times of crisis. The Israel News Agency disseminates direct news feeds from the Israel Government Press Office, Prime Minister's Office, Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Israel Ministry of Defense, the Israel Defense Forces, the Israel Ministry of Trade and the Israel Ministry of Tourism to a global audience.


The above news content was edited and SEO optimized in London and Israel for the Internet by the
Leyden Communications Internet Marketing PR SEO Group London SEO Pr New York SEO Pr - Israel, London, New York.

Friday, September 25, 2009

Israel PM Netanyahu’s Address to UN 64th General Assembly - Text, Video

Israel PM Netanyahu’s Address to UN 64th General Assembly - Text, Video

Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the UN asks the world body "have you no shame" for hosting the Iran President who denies the Holocaust? Netanyahu reminds the world that England defended herself against Nazi rocket attacks by leveling cities in Europe while Israel went house to house in Gaza placing her own troops at risk to avoid civilian casualties. And it was Israel which was named as the aggressor by the UN for defending herself against Hamas terror rockets on her cities and towns. Why did the UN fail to mention, why did the United Nations not condemn the terror group Hamas for a double war crime - attacking without provocation, Israel civilians in Sderot, Ashdod and Ashkelon while hiding behind Palestinian women and children?

By Israel News Agency Staff

United Nations, New York ----- September 24, 2009 ... The following speech by the Israel Prime Minister to the delegates of the UN was provided to the Israel News Agency by the Israel Prime Minister's Office and the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen, nearly 62 years ago, the United Nations recognized the right of the Jews, an ancient people 3,500 years-old, to a state of their own in their ancestral homeland.

I stand here today as the Prime Minister of Israel, the Jewish state, and I speak to you on behalf of my country and my people.

The United Nations was founded after the carnage of World War II and the horrors of the Holocaust. It was charged with preventing the recurrence of such horrendous events.

Nothing has undermined that central mission more than the systematic assault on the truth. Yesterday the President of Iran stood at this very podium, spewing his latest anti-Semitic rants. Just a few days earlier, he again claimed that the Holocaust is a lie.

Last month, I went to a villa in a suburb of Berlin called Wannsee. There, on January 20, 1942, after a hearty meal, senior Nazi officials met and decided how to exterminate the Jewish people. The detailed minutes of that meeting have been preserved by successive German governments. Here is a copy of those minutes, in which the Nazis issued precise instructions on how to carry out the extermination of the Jews. Is this a lie?

A day before I was in Wannsee, I was given in Berlin the original construction plans for the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp. Those plans are signed by Hitler’s deputy, Heinrich Himmler himself. Here is a copy of the plans for Auschwitz-Birkenau, where one million Jews were murdered. Is this too a lie?

This June, US President Obama visited the Buchenwald concentration camp. Did President Obama pay tribute to a lie?

And what of the Auschwitz survivors whose arms still bear the tattooed numbers branded on them by the Nazis? Are those tattoos a lie? One-third of all Jews perished in the conflagration. Nearly every Jewish family was affected, including my own. My wife’s grandparents, her father’s two sisters and three brothers, and all the aunts, uncles and cousins were all murdered by the Nazis. Is that also a lie?

Yesterday, the man who calls the Holocaust a lie spoke from this podium. To those who refused to come here and to those who left this room in protest, I commend you. You stood up for moral clarity and you brought honor to your countries.

But to those who gave this Holocaust-denier a hearing, I say on behalf of my people, the Jewish people, and decent people everywhere: Have you no shame? Have you no decency?

A mere six decades after the Holocaust, you give legitimacy to a man who denies that the murder of six million Jews took place and pledges to wipe out the Jewish state.

What a disgrace! What a mockery of the charter of the United Nations! Perhaps some of you think that this man and his odious regime threaten only the Jews. You’re wrong.

History has shown us time and again that what starts with attacks on the Jews eventually ends up engulfing many others.

This Iran regime is fueled by an extreme fundamentalism that burst onto the world scene three decades ago after lying dormant for centuries. In the past thirty years, this fanaticism has swept the globe with a murderous violence and cold-blooded impartiality in its choice of victims. It has callously slaughtered Moslems and Christians, Jews and Hindus, and many others. Though it is comprised of different offshoots, the adherents of this unforgiving creed seek to return humanity to medieval times.

Wherever they can, they impose a backward regimented society where women, minorities, gays or anyone not deemed to be a true believer is brutally subjugated. The struggle against this fanaticism does not pit faith against faith nor civilization against civilization.

It pits civilization against barbarism, the 21st century against the 9th century, those who sanctify life against those who glorify death.

The primitivism of the 9th century ought to be no match for the progress of the 21st century. The allure of freedom, the power of technology, the reach of communications should surely win the day. Ultimately, the past cannot triumph over the future. And the future offers all nations magnificent bounties of hope. The pace of progress is growing exponentially.

It took us centuries to get from the printing press to the telephone, decades to get from the telephone to the personal computer, and only a few years to get from the personal computer to the internet.

What seemed impossible a few years ago is already outdated, and we can scarcely fathom the changes that are yet to come. We will crack the genetic code. We will cure the incurable. We will lengthen our lives. We will find a cheap alternative to fossil fuels and clean up the planet.

I am proud that my country Israel is at the forefront of these advances – by leading innovations in science and technology, medicine and biology, agriculture and water, energy and the environment. These innovations the world over offer humanity a sunlit future of unimagined promise.

But if the most primitive fanaticism can acquire the most deadly weapons, the march of history could be reversed for a time. And like the belated victory over the Nazis, the forces of progress and freedom will prevail only after an horrific toll of blood and fortune has been exacted from mankind. That is why the greatest threat facing the world today is the marriage between religious fanaticism and the weapons of mass destruction.

The most urgent challenge facing this body is to prevent the tyrants of Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Are the member states of the United Nations up to that challenge? Will the international community confront a despotism that terrorizes its own people as they bravely stand up for freedom?

Will it take action against the dictators who stole an election in broad daylight and gunned down Iranian protesters who died in the streets choking in their own blood? Will the international community thwart the world’s most pernicious sponsors and practitioners of terrorism?

Above all, will the international community stop the terrorist regime of Iran from developing atomic weapons, thereby endangering the peace of the entire world?

The people of Iran are courageously standing up to this regime. People of goodwill around the world stand with them, as do the thousands who have been protesting outside this hall. Will the United Nations stand by their side?

Ladies and Gentlemen, the jury is still out on the United Nations, and recent signs are not encouraging. Rather than condemning the terrorists and their Iranian patrons, some here have condemned their victims. That is exactly what a recent UN report on Gaza did, falsely equating the terrorists with those they targeted.

For eight long years, Hamas fired from Gaza thousands of missiles, mortars and rockets on nearby Israeli cities. Year after year, as these missiles were deliberately hurled at our civilians, not a single UN resolution was passed condemning those criminal attacks. We heard nothing – absolutely nothing – from the UN Human Rights Council, a misnamed institution if there ever was one.

In 2005, hoping to advance peace, Israel unilaterally withdrew from every inch of Gaza. It dismantled 21 settlements and uprooted over 8,000 Israelis. We didn’t get peace. Instead we got an Iranian backed terror base fifty miles from Tel Aviv. Life in Israeli towns and cities next to Gaza became a nightmare. You see, the Hamas rocket attacks not only continued, they increased tenfold. Again, the UN was silent.

Finally, after eight years of this unremitting assault, Israel was finally forced to respond. But how should we have responded?

Well, there is only one example in history of thousands of rockets being fired on a country’s civilian population. It happened when the Nazis rocketed British cities during World War II. During that war, the allies leveled German cities, causing hundreds of thousands of casualties. Israel chose to respond differently. Faced with an enemy committing a double war crime of firing on civilians while hiding behind civilians – Israel sought to conduct surgical strikes against the rocket launchers.

That was no easy task because the terrorists were firing missiles from homes and schools, using mosques as weapons depots and ferreting explosives in ambulances. Israel, by contrast, tried to minimize casualties by urging Palestinian civilians to vacate the targeted areas.

We dropped countless flyers over their homes, sent thousands of text messages and called thousands of cell phones asking people to leave. Never has a country gone to such extraordinary lengths to remove the enemy’s civilian population from harm’s way.

Yet faced with such a clear case of aggressor and victim, who did the UN Human Rights Council decide to condemn? Israel. A democracy legitimately defending itself against terror is morally hanged, drawn and quartered, and given an unfair trial to boot.

By these twisted standards, the UN Human Rights Council would have dragged Roosevelt and Churchill to the dock as war criminals. What a perversion of truth. What a perversion of justice.

Delegates of the United Nations,

Will you accept this farce?

Because if you do, the United Nations would revert to its darkest days, when the worst violators of human rights sat in judgment against the law-abiding democracies, when Zionism was equated with racism and when an automatic majority could declare that the earth is flat.

If this body does not reject this report, it would send a message to terrorists everywhere: Terror pays; if you launch your attacks from densely populated areas, you will win immunity. And in condemning Israel, this body would also deal a mortal blow to peace. Here’s why.

When Israel left Gaza, many hoped that the missile attacks would stop. Others believed that at the very least, Israel would have international legitimacy to exercise its right of self-defense. What legitimacy? What self-defense?

The same UN that cheered Israel as it left Gaza and promised to back our right of self-defense now accuses us –my people, my country – of war crimes? And for what? For acting responsibly in self-defense. What a travesty!

Israel justly defended itself against terror. This biased and unjust report is a clear-cut test for all governments. Will you stand with Israel or will you stand with the terrorists?

We must know the answer to that question now. Now and not later. Because if Israel is again asked to take more risks for peace, we must know today that you will stand with us tomorrow. Only if we have the confidence that we can defend ourselves can we take further risks for peace.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

All of Israel wants peace.

Any time an Arab leader genuinely wanted peace with us, we made peace. We made peace with Egypt led by Anwar Sadat. We made peace with Jordan led by King Hussein. And if the Palestinians truly want peace, I and my government, and the people of Israel, will make peace. But we want a genuine peace, a defensible peace, a permanent peace. In 1947, this body voted to establish two states for two peoples – a Jewish state and an Arab state. The Jews accepted that resolution. The Arabs rejected it.

We ask the Palestinians to finally do what they have refused to do for 62 years: Say yes to a Jewish state. Just as we are asked to recognize a nation-state for the Palestinian people, the Palestinians must be asked to recognize the nation state of the Jewish people. The Jewish people are not foreign conquerors in the Land of Israel. This is the land of our forefathers.

Inscribed on the walls outside this building is the great Biblical vision of peace: “Nation shall not lift up sword against nation. They shall learn war no more.” These words were spoken by the Jewish prophet Isaiah 2,800 years ago as he walked in my country, in my city, in the hills of Judea and in the streets of Jerusalem.

We are not strangers to this land. It is our homeland. As deeply connected as we are to this land, we recognize that the Palestinians also live there and want a home of their own. We want to live side by side with them, two free peoples living in peace, prosperity and dignity.

But we must have security. The Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves except those handful of powers that could endanger Israel.

That is why a Palestinian state must be effectively demilitarized. We don’t want another Gaza, another Iranian backed terror base abutting Jerusalem and perched on the hills a few kilometers from Tel Aviv.

We want peace.

I believe such a peace can be achieved. But only if we roll back the forces of terror, led by Iran, that seek to destroy peace, eliminate Israel and overthrow the world order. The question facing the international community is whether it is prepared to confront those forces or accommodate them.

Over seventy years ago, Winston Churchill lamented what he called the “confirmed unteachability of mankind,” the unfortunate habit of civilized societies to sleep until danger nearly overtakes them.

Churchill bemoaned what he called the “want of foresight, the unwillingness to act when action will be simple and effective, the lack of clear thinking, the confusion of counsel until emergency comes, until self-preservation strikes its jarring gong.”

I speak here today in the hope that Churchill’s assessment of the “unteachibility of mankind” is for once proven wrong.

I speak here today in the hope that we can learn from history — that we can prevent danger in time.

In the spirit of the timeless words spoken to Joshua over 3,000 years ago, let us be strong and of good courage. Let us confront this peril, secure our future and, God willing, forge an enduring peace for generations to come.